Some time ago, I was queried by someone about an article I’d published, which I can no longer recall. Have you checked the facts against two sources he asked, or said, or something like that. I told him no. This is one of the biggest fallacies of so-called journalism, reporting, etc. If two sources are good, surely fifty must be exponentially better, no? Like the fifty so-called Intelligence professionals who claimed the Hunter Biden laptop had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation?
The Fallacy Of Two Sources
Some time ago, I was queried by someone about an article I’d published, which I can no longer recall. Have you checked the facts against two sources he asked, or said, or something like that. I told him no. This is one of the biggest fallacies of so-called journalism, reporting, etc. If two sources are good, surely fifty must be exponentially better, no? Like the fifty so-called Intelligence professionals who claimed the Hunter Biden laptop had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation?
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.