Virginia Giuffre (1983-2025) — Death Of A Professional Victim

I don’t usually take pleasure in writing an obituary but this odious woman should be mourned only by her close family, and then with reservations. People who should know better but don’t have hailed her as some kind of saintly figure.

Professor Tim Wilson delivered a virtual hagiography of her on his YouTube channel while Ryan Dawson claimed she’d had a five year nightmare with serial rapists and had taken down an international paedophile network. She did neither of those things.

In spite of her proven duplicity, the mainstream media, much of social media, and even lawyers went along with her false narratives and outright lies, but not everyone was taken in. Her detractors include two titled ladies who have spilled the beans on her.

Royal insider Lady Colin Campbell has debunked Sweet Virginia on her YouTube channel while Lady Victoria Hervey has gone on the offensive all over the media. So what is the truth about the woman who claimed to have been “trafficked” by Jeffrey Epstein and raped by Prince Andrew?

Virginia Giuffre was born Virginia Louise Roberts at Sacramento on August 9, 1983. The family relocated to Florida when she was four years old. She claimed she was first molested at the age of seven, by a close family friend, and the evidence for this is?

She was said to have been in and out of foster care as a child, which might be a reflection on her family more than on her, but according to Lady Colin Campbell, Sweet Virginia was a trust fund baby who wanted for nothing. This claim is backed up by the family of Ghislaine Maxwell who researched and published a lengthy report on her following Ghislaine’s arrest.

Before she met Jeffrey Epstein, Giuffre claims to have met and been “trafficked” by another predator, a man named Ron Eppinger. Before going any further, a few words about “trafficking”. This word has sinister connotations, but it is really a euphemism for prostitution, although “people trafficking” may simply be moving (illegal) immigrants from A to B. In the United States, prostitution is illegal for both prostitutes and their clients, but feminist theory dictates that women are always innocent victims while men are guilty predators. In Britain and many other countries, a woman who sells sex is called a prostitute; in the United States she is a prostituted woman or prostituted person.

It is of course necessary to distinguish between prostitution and child sexual abuse, but advocates frequently ignore this distinction.

Eppinger may have been an odious individual but there is no credible evidence that he ever sexually abused a 12 year old Virginia. The FBI has published a trove of documents on him, but here is a précis. After pleading guilty to a slew of charges, he was given a mere 21 month sentence; had he been abusing minors, he might well have faced a 21 year sentence.

The aforementioned linked document contains much innuendo, but there is no evidence that Eppinger was in any way involved with Jeffrey Epstein.

Virginia Roberts was working at Donald Trump’s famous Mar-a-Lago when she was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell. She was lured initially by the promise of becoming a masseuse, but the only massages she gave were to Epstein, these were sexual massages for which she was well-remunerated. She was 16 at the time although she would claim initially that she was 15, but she would not have been employed at Mar-a-Lago if that were indeed the case.

In Florida, the age of consent is a hefty 18, but if Epstein had recruited girls of this age in the UK, he would have done nothing illegal, whatever one thinks of his morals.

Epstein wanted younger girls though, and Sweet Virginia was given the task of recruiting them for him, something she has admitted doing, and appears to have done so with alacrity.

Another word here about semantics, Epstein has been branded a paedophile. Paedophilia is a sexual attraction to prepubescents. There is no credible evidence that he ever used prepubescent girls, either for massages or anything else.

Before Epstein though, Sweet Virginia accused two teenage friends of rape. The bottom line is that she was hanging out with them, drinking alcohol and smoking drugs then had sex with both of them and withdrew her consent retroactively. These are not the actions of a trafficking victim but of a teen slut. Having said that, the teen years can be difficult for both boys and girls, especially in the modern world when they have so much time on their hands. Virginia clearly went off the rails, but Jeffrey Epstein was not to blame for this.

It is a documented fact that she travelled to London and Europe with Epstein. Then, he gave her an unusual eighteenth birthday present. In her unpublished memoir (read novel) The Billionaire’s Playboy Club, she writes:

“I know how much you have wanted this for so long and you are more than deserving of it. You are going away to Thailand to learn authentic Thai Massage and within eight weeks you’ll receive a certificate for being a qualified Thai Massage Therapist.”

That was Epstein talking. And her response?

“Astonished at his attempts to see me get what I wanted, not exactly the type of massage I was interested in but it was a start and a first certificate for me to acquire. My eyes lit up and I threw my arms around his neck, planting a big kiss on his lips...”

Does that sound like a teenage girl being abused?

The bottom line is that she did go to Thailand, on her own. Epstein wanted her to bring back a certain girl with him, so she was clearly a trusted lieutenant rather than any kind of victim. Instead, while there she met Australian national Robert Giuffre and married him after a whirlwind romance. Prior to tying the knot, she phoned Epstein and told him. His response was “Have a good life!”

Then, the former Virginia Roberts flew off to Australia with her new husband. If her story had ended there, it might have been a fairy tale ending to an initially troubled life. Her husband may be a cuck, but not a few men marry prostitutes, and he appears to be a thoroughly decent individual. Alas, her story does not end there.

In 2005, a woman found her 14 year old daughter in possession of several hundred dollars and complained to Palm Beach Police. The money had come from Jeffrey Epstein. This would result in his arrest and conviction for procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting a prostitute. He received a 13 month sentence, most of which was spent on work release, but he was at least required to register as a sex offender.

The leniency of this sentence has been attacked by many pundits, but when one compares his activities with those of the grooming gangs (now called rape gangs) in England, they pale into insignificance. Although after his second arrest, Epstein was accused of sundry rapes, there is no credible evidence that these girls did anything more than massage him.

That does not apply to Virginia, who as stated and as she admitted, recruited girls for him, so when the FBI called on this now Australian housewife, she decided to paint herself as a victim.

Again, her story could have ended there, but in February 2011, she gave an interview to The Mail On Sunday following the publication of that now notorious photograph.

We will assume here that this photograph is genuine, but what did Sweet Virginia say therein, specifically about her March 2001 London visit?

“Ghislaine and I went to Burberry, where she bought me a £5,000 bag, and to a few other designer stores where we bought a couple of dresses, a pair of embroidered jeans and a pink singlet, perfume and make-up”.

Hmm, this is trafficking? Then, after meeting up with Epstein and Prince Andrew:

“The four of them went out to dinner and on to Tramp nightclub where, she says, Andrew danced with her. ‘After about an hour-and-a-half, we drove back to Ghislaine’s. All of us went upstairs and I asked Jeffrey to snap a picture of me with the Prince. I wanted something to show my Mom. Ghislaine and Jeffrey left us after that, and later Andrew left.’”

That’s right, she wanted the photograph to show her mother.

And “There is no suggestion that there was any sexual contact between Virginia and Andrew, or that Andrew knew that Epstein paid her to have sex with his friends.”

Get that, there was no consensual sex and certainly no rape: no sex at all. Yet fast forward a few years and she was sexually abused by a member of the Royal Family. Boo hoo.

These facts have been in the public domain and easily accessible for well over a decade yet the media goes along with the sex trafficking, I was raped by Prince Andrew narrative. Why?

When Andrew sat down for what has been called that car crash interview with Emily Maitlis, he had clearly been poorly briefed and advised. His actions give the appearance of a guilty man, while as he is clearly not guilty leaves only one conclusion, there are people who want him to appear so, perhaps as an attack on the Monarchy. By the same people who paid for her expensive civil litigation? (see below).

Andrew should never have settled that lawsuit with Giuffre because this is being widely interpreted as an admission of guilt. The same thing happened to the totally innocent Michael Jackson.

Leaving all that aside, Prince Andrew is far from the only man this self-confessed child sex trafficker has falsely accused. One of the others was Alan Dershowitz, whom she sued for defamation when he denied her allegations. She made these allegations in the first instance in a court filing, which was leaked to the world. Such documents are privileged, which means in effect people can say anything they like without fear of legal repercussion.

With Dershowitz though, she bit off more than she could chew, and when it came to discovery, she was unable to produce a shred of evidence that she had ever met him, so claimed she “might” have been mistaken due to the tumultuous time she’d had. After she withdrew, Dershowitz was magnanimous where before he said he wanted to see her in prison. Talking of which, had she been a credible witness, she would have testified at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, but the authorities did not consider her so, although under other circumstances she might well have ended up as a co-defendant.

Which brings us now to her suicide at just 41 prefixed by that insane claim about the car crash (which actually happened) and having been given four days to live. She claimed to have been abused by her estranged husband - abused by yet another man - but as he rather than she had custody of their sons and daughter, what does that suggest?

Apologists for this odious woman claim a lifetime of trauma had caught up with her, but it is more likely that her lies were catching up with her. If Lady Victoria Hervey or anyone else is able to prove definitively that infamous photograph is indeed a fake, the world will owe Prince Andrew a huge apology.

She has also been praised as an opponent of sex trafficking and set up a non–profit ostensibly to combat it. This article from January 2023 sheds some light on that. Some non-profits - including this one - are simply a disguised form of money laundering, Black Lives Matter being a prime example. People set them up then hire their family and friends at exorbitant fees to carry out meaningless work like consultancy.

One final word, not about Virginia Giuffre but about Jeffrey Epstein. This man has been the subject of an enormous amount of speculation, talk of paedophile networks, working for the Mossad, the Deep State, and so on, but here is an alternative hypothesis. What if this is all smoke and mirrors, what if rather than protecting the guilty as in the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, the authorities are protecting the innocent?

Their reluctance to release the names of everyone associated with Epstein could simply be to protect the reputations of innocent men, and not a few women. In view of the dirt that has been thrown at Prince Andrew, this is worth considering. And especially when one recalls that much of that dirt was thrown by a woman who might best be described as a chiselling little whore, self-confessed child sex trafficker, and many times proven liar.