They Dared Call It Conspiracy
In 1971, the American conservative Gary Allen published a cheap paperback book for mass distribution. None Dare Call It Conspiracy was co-written with Larry Abraham and has what on the face of it is a bizarre thesis, namely that far from being a movement of the downtrodden masses, socialism is a tool of the super-rich.
The authors back up this thesis with a plethora of facts in context, most of which are undeniable. One of their major sources of information was a hefty tome called Tragedy & Hope, which was written by Carroll Quigley (1910-77).
Quigley was a liberal academic, and a mentor of Bill Clinton. Conspiriology aside, this book is a fascinating read because the good professor explains many events in history, putting them in their proper context, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor which was and still is widely believed not to have been a surprise. He also explains how the reality of Soviet espionage in the United States was greatly exaggerated by both the FBI and former communists such as Elizabeth Bentley.
For Gary Allen though, the really important part of this book is Quigley’s claim (undoubtedly true) that there exists a secret or semi-secret network of powerful people, their acolytes and dupes who control many major world events who are plotting to abolish the United States, creating a world supra-government, probably under the auspices of the United Nations. Quigley claimed to have been given access to the network’s papers for two years.
At the time Tragedy & Hope was written, this threat was more theoretical than practical, but with the technology that has been developed since, especially since the 1990s, it is now a very real one.
In None Dare Call It Conspiracy, the authors point out that many of the early key conspirators on the banking side were Jewish, and that because of this, detractors were able to ridicule or poison the discussion by denouncing anyone who mentioned the conspiracy as anti-Semites. Predictably, the ADL denounced the book, in spite of Allen’s cringeworthy philo-Semitism.
None Dare Call It Conspiracy was far from the first book to expose the conspirators. W. Cleon Skousen published The Naked Capitalist about the same time. The first edition of A. K. Chesterton’s The New Unhappy Lords was published in 1965. Chesterton took a less American centric view and concentrated more on race, something Allen hardly mentioned. Another American conservative, Dan Smoot, had published The Invisible Government back in 1962. This book concentrates on the CFR, an organisation that has since come right out into the open, and even has its own website. As the CFR’s membership now includes such towering intellects as Angelina Jolie, it remains to be seen if it is still a genuine threat to freedom.
The ADL is far from the only outfit to smear Gary Allen and (all) others who investigate or simply mention the conspirators as anti-Semites. For example, in 1977, the spineless goy academic Colin Holmes published an article about what he called the modern career of The Protocols Of Zion. The Protocols is believed to be based on Dialogues In Hell, or to give it its full title: DIALOGUE AUX ENFERS ENTRE MACHIAVEL ET MONTESQUIEU OU LA POLITIQUE DE MACHIAVEL AU XIXe SIECLE, PAR UN CONTEMPORAIN. This book was actually written by Maurice Joly and published in 1865. It was republished in 1868 and is said to be a satire on an entirely different subject.
While no one should take The Protocols Of Zion seriously, one person who did was John Birch Society founder Robert Welch, who claimed The Protocols was written by Lenin who set down the programme of the Communist Party in them. And the evidence for this is?
However, let us take a deeper look. Writing in The Land For The (Chosen) People Racket, Major Douglas quoted from them thus:
(The above is verbatim). Let us not be too hasty. Seventeen years before Dialogues In Hell first appeared, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto, wherein we find:
Plank 1: Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.
Plank 2: A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Plank 3: Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
You can read the other nine planks here or download the full pamphlet from any number of websites, but the above are starkly relevant to what is happening today, especially in the United Kingdom and with recent revelations in the United States. The current Chancellor of the Exchequer (Rachel from accounts) may be an economic illiterate who lied on her CV, but the policies she is pursuing will, if successful, disinherit the majority of our farmers.
The way things are going, unless she and her ilk are stopped, this may happen sooner than you think, because the Starmer Government’s tax policies are causing enormous numbers of wealthy people to flee abroad, and at the same time, Britain is importing countless thousands of illegal immigrants – overwhelming unskilled men of a certain age who are a burden on the country not to mention a pest and at times a danger to young women.
What will happen to the land of the farmers who are bankrupted? It will be taken over by mega-corporations, and this is the nexus with finance capitalism. For those interested in the documented history of how the extreme left is funded by its supposed enemy, a good starting point is the works of Antony C. Sutton, in particular his book Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution.
The recent mass invasion of the United States promoted by the criminal Biden Administration was funded overwhelmingly by NGOs. It remains to be seen how much of that funding came from the big foundations, but we know for example that Episcopal Migration Ministries received over $50 million from the American Government in 2023, which may have been the real reason its so-called bishop, Mariann Edgar Budde, excoriated Donald Trump for his pledge to secure the southern border and kick out illegal migrants.
All the policies pursued by the Starmer Government, the previous Biden Administration, the lunatic Trudeau in Canada, are designed wilfully to destroy the middle classes and to bankrupt small farmers (the kulaks of our day).
We can argue about who is ultimately responsible, but the fact that this happened and is still happening, is beyond dispute.