Sadiq Khan Wants To Silence Your Sons (And Rape Your Daughters)
If that title sounds a little too forceful, let us rephrase it: Sadiq Khan doesn’t give a monkey’s if your daughters are raped by Pakistani degenerates, and he wants to silence YOU if you voice the slightest dissent about any of his policies.
It is difficult to believe that Londoners voted for this creature once for London Mayor, much less three times. Only two people have held that post before him. Ken Livingstone served two terms followed by Boris Johnson who also served two terms. Livingstone was often derided as Red Ken because of his antics with the old GLC, and Boris, well, Boris is just Boris. Nevertheless, both men did reasonably good jobs, especially Livingstone, on whose watch the shocking 7/7 attacks were committed.
Livingstone is now retired, while Johnson went on to bigger and greater things. If he is not yet retired, he does not appear to be very active at the moment.
Among other things, Sadiq Khan – or Sad IQ Khan as Mahyar Tousi insists of calling him – is a former solicitor. Khan is widely believed to be a Moslem and does not shrink from that label, but there are Moslems and there are Moslems. When he campaigns, he does so with his wife on his arm, playing the devout, but he also has some very un-Islamic views, in particular his endorsement of sexual perversion, so-called Pride. Last June, he issued the following statement:
“I’m delighted that London’s diverse LGBTQI+ communities and allies are once again joining together in the heart of our capital for our world-renowned Pride celebrations and march of solidarity. Pride is one of the highlights of my year and it is an honour to have been on every march since I was first elected as Mayor in 2016.”
Ask your local imam what he thinks of that. Khan is a Moslem in name only, he is really a creature of the World Economic Forum and has been following its policies, especially with restrictions on traffic which have crippled small businesses in London. He also has an even more sinister side. Listen to the way he talks down to Susan Hall at a recent meeting of the London Assembly, refusing to acknowledge the existence of grooming gangs.
Some people might interpret this as misogyny, but his behaviour is more nuanced than that. In 2009, serial rapist John Worboys (known as the Black Cab Rapist) was given a life sentence (in effect) for a string of offences against vulnerable women. In less than a decade he was up for parole and would have been granted it but for a high profile public campaign to keep him behind bars. To his credit, Khan was instrumental in leading that campaign; Warboys was denied parole and has since pleaded guilty to further offences of an historical nature. He is unlikely ever to be released.
This begs the question, if Khan was prepared to go to these lengths to keep a dangerous predator behind bars, why doesn’t he give a stuff about the victims of the grooming gangs? The answer is simple; John Worboys is white, the grooming gangs are not.
After that disgraceful performance with Susan Hall, Khan is in the news for a different reason, calling for censorship of social media, to protect democracy, of course: “First, we must ratchet up the pressure on social media companies to tackle lies, hate and misinformation” he writes.
Hmm, misinformation? Like Donald Trump was a Russian agent, the Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian propaganda operation, like covid-19 originated in a Chinese wet market? These were all lies propagated by the mainstream media, lies that people were censored for exposing.
Ironically, at the bottom of this Guardian article, we read
This is what we’re up against
Bad actors spreading disinformation online to fuel intolerance and undermine democracy.
A media ecosystem dominated by a handful of billionaire owners.
Teams of lawyers from the rich and powerful trying to stop us publishing stories they don’t want you to see.
Lobby groups with opaque funding who are determined to undermine facts about the climate emergency and other established science.
Authoritarian states with no regard for the freedom of the press.
**************************************************
You got that? Sadiq Khan and the Guardian will decide what is disinformation, which they will suppress, and publish anything they want, anything that fits in with their own statist agenda.
The latest wave of censorship also includes, predictably, protecting children from the harmful effects of social media – the remit of Mum and Dad, not Big Brother.
Khan and people like him, of all ethnicities and classes, want you to shut your mouth. There is a familiar two word response to that – the second word is off.

