Another Reason To Reject Digital ID

While no one alive today can remember living in a world without electricity, there are still a few of us who can remember a world without the Internet. I have been on-line longer than most; I started off with CIX and related, pre-Internet web services. This Sunday, I was thrown back into the pre-Internet world when I lost connection and was unable to reconnect; I couldn’t even use my phone because a while back my ISP thought it would be a good idea to connect my landline to my desktop, so that wasn’t working either.

I have to date managed to avoid buying a mobile phone but I fear I will not be able to for much longer.

To cut a long story short, when I managed to get through to my ISP using a public telephone – there are still a few – I was told by a robot that the fault was not with my hub as I thought but external. The same robot offered me my earliest appointment with an engineer – Tuesday A.M. How could I refuse?

Monday, I had some work to do so went to Penge Library, where the Internet was down, but I was told Beckenham Library was okay, so another short bus ride and I managed to do my scanning and surfing. I was unable to access my e-mails because I have 2-step verification linked to my only telephone number. When I got home and at last sat in front of my desktop, I decided to catch up on some file management.

Not everybody spends all day sitting in front of a computer, but I have always enjoyed it since I learned to type properly, well, half properly. It was at this point I began thinking about digital ID. Keir Starmer, our sick joke of a Prime Minister, says this will stop the illegal immigrants who are invading our nation in small boats, but nobody believes him and nobody should. The sole purpose of digital ID is to control us peasants, and if it is ever implemented along with CBDCs, it will be the end of freedom, the end of the West too, and of everything else the unelected elite want to rid themselves of.

Leaving that aside, I thought of the practicalities or rather the impracticalities of it. As I said, I do not own a mobile phone, and although I am in a minority, there are plenty of people, especially older people, who likewise do not. Are we then to carry around actual ID cards - with barcodes as is the norm nowadays? That is an alternative, but there is another one, and it is closer than you think.

In 1995, David Icke wrote: “If you want barcoded human beings linked to a central computer, you must first get them to accept credit and identity cards.”

They laughed at Icke then. Are they still laughing now? More to the point, are you laughing, and if so, why?

Digital ID is no laughing matter, rather it is the blueprint for your future enslavement.

How much of a leap is it from people being compelled to carry around digital ID in one form or another to human beings being barcoded, or having a micro-chip installed in the back of the neck at birth?

We have already seen people debanked, not only so-called politically exposed persons like Nigel Farage and Melania Trump, but the musician Kanye West. In Canada, we saw the funds of truckers seized. Remember vaccine passports? None of these will be necessary if everyone is micro-chipped. I predict you will hear politicians making that argument within five years.

The one good thing about the digital ID debate is that the loony left is opposed to it as much as conservatives. Let’s keep up the pressure so we can soon laugh at David Icke again.